Legislating Reproductive Rights: The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 :: Politics Political Research Papers

Legislating Reproductive Rights The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 nipWhile no federal legislation currently exists limiting access to stillbirths in general, in 2003, the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act became the first piece of federal legislation to regulate a particular abortion method. This specialized physical process, known in the medical community as intact dilation and extraction, is a procedure used to terminate late-term pregnancies and is sometimes the safest method of doing so. Since the bans enactment, it has been challenged and defeated in federal court three times due to its vague nomenclature which can be construed to encroach upon the fundamental right to abortion. Furthermore, the ban has been found to be an unconstitutional violation of established case law pertaining to specific abortion procedures due to its vague language and lack of a health exception to protect the womans well-being. This paper also presents research suggesting that the real goal of the ban is to erode the basic constitutional right to choose and that judgments against the ban should be upheld.Introduction The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 claims to limit a specific abortion procedure known as intact dilation and extraction (D&X), which is sometimes the safest method for aborting late-term pregnancies. Many factors contribute to the need for late-term abortions and the consequences of denying abortion can be detrimental to a womans well-being. Restricting a specific procedure would limit safe options available to women and their doctors. Although the right to obtain an early abortion has been established as a fundamental liberty, this Act uses vague language that could extend to other forms of abortion performed earlier in a pregnancy and fails to include an exception to preserve the womans health. This paper will integrate previous decisions regarding abortion with an accurate description of the dilation and extraction proced ure in order to demonstrate how the Acts lack of clarity may result in its application to different procedures. As a result, it is a knowing attempt to erode the rights of women. Women deserve the right to choose what happens to their bodies, especially when almost half of all unplanned pregnancies, about 1.31 million per year, are terminated by abortion (Overview). To attempt to ban a specific procedure using vague language may incidentally extend to constitutionally protected forms of abortion, consequentially impinging on our constitutional rights, disregarding pertinent case law and jeopardizing womens well-being.

European Imperialsim in Africa was Justified :: Politics Government

europiuman Imperialism in Africa was JustifiedThe first Industrial Revolution began in Great Britain. It led to a dramatic increase in factories, therefore a vast amount of manufactured goods. The demand for goods created by the Industrial Revolution helped clear the way for the mature of Imperialism because Great Britain and eventually all of Europe sought after more natural resources and raw materials. Imperialism is the policy in which a stronger country seeks to dominate a less developed country both politically and economically. Although the European imperialism of Africa was exploitive and self seeking, it was justified because it ultimately enhanced the growth and development of the African nations done new laws, government, well ordered finance and freedom form oppression.When the Europeans arrived in Africa, many would of thought that imperialism wasn?t fied because the Europeans were enslaving the Africans. As stated in David Diops An Anthology of West African Verse, And in the Conquerors voice said, Boy A chair, a napkin, a drink. Stated blatantly, the conqueror is a European, and he is commanding an African to serve him. Forcing Africans into slavery certainly doesn?t justify European imperialism in Africa, however, there argon many thinks as to why imperialism actually was justified. One reason, is the fact that the raw materials the Europeans took from Africa were unused. As stated in Lord Frederick Lugards, The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa, Who can deny the right of the hungry people of Europe to utilize the wasted bounties of nature... Lugard shows that Europe had the right to take raw materials from Africa because they were unused. This means those who argue that European imperialism in Africa was non justified because the Europeans simply took raw materials, are obviously mistaken. Another reason that European imperialism in Africa was justified, is the fact that Europeans did not take over Africa solely for their self interes ts. As plainly stated in excepts from Lord Carnarvons records. ...it is certainly not a desire of selfish interests... Clearly, those who argue that Europeans just wanted to benefit themselves through the imperialism of Africa, are incorrect. Unfortunately, even though European imperialism in Africa was justified, many Africans are still suffering from the effects to this day.

The Power of the Internet Essay -- Essays Papers

The Power of the InternetThe area of technology in todays society that is expanding without bound is the Internet. Millions of concourse belong to the online existence full of articles, shops, the latest news, virtual communities, etc. If a person needs information or directions the fastest and most successful place to turn is online. For simulation the quote, You can get anything you want with a click of a mouse, has become the motto for modern day America. Inside the virtual world are millions of groups and organizations strengthened to interest people who share common ideas, values, and goals. The Internet groups, commonly refereed to as communities, appeal to a certain aspect of everyones lives. Finding a community that individual feels comfortable in can be a complicated process as explained in the article Finding stars Own in Cyberspace, by Amy Bruckman. One of the major communities that has been in the news recently is the company Napster. Napsters focus is music and att racts an audience of music lovers. The article The Muddy Waters of Pirate Music, by Giancarlo Varanini, discusses the expound of MP3s and the influence of the music labor. By examining the two articles mentioned and evaluating the idea of communities many opinions arise about the effect the Internet has on music and visa versa. The music industry of America is one of extraordinary power and influence. The art of music has been around for centuries from Beethoven, to Elvis Presley, to The Rolling Stones, and in more recent times, Metallica. Music has conformed to adapt to the dynamic societies and interests of its listeners. Today there exists a wide variety of music, whose focus attracts numerous audiences. The industry has continued to expand to ... ...importance. The popularity of the Internet is spilling into all other major factions of America, such(prenominal) as advertising, music, art, film, business, etc. Online groups, such as Napster, have worked their way into mainstr eam America and are making more money than ever before. As people castigate to regular companies having dot COM addresses at the end of every commercial, the Internet will become a normal aspect of life. The advantages of the Internet outweigh the disadvantages and soon people with not be able to remember what life was like without it. It is time to face the facts the Internet is here to stay. Works Cited Bruckman, Amy. Finding Ones Own in Cyberspace. editor Richard Holeton.Sngapore Mcgraw Hill, 1998. 171-178 Varanini, Giancarlo. The Napster controversy. ZDNetUK News. 2000. http//www.zdnet.co.uk/news/2000/14ns-14711.html (10 Apr. 2000)

Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy Onassis Essay -- Biography Biographies Bio

Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy OnassisJacqueline Lee Bouvier was born on July 28th, 1929 in East Hampton, Long Island. Jacquelines mother was Janet Lee Bouvier, a highly ambitious horseback rider. Jacqueline was nicknamed "Jackie" after her father, Jack Bouvier. Young Jackies parents were a very well off coupled. Her father had an estimated fortune of 7 million dollars and Janet came from a wealthy family also, her father had been chairman of the board of Chase National Bank.Asides for the Bouviers wealth, the other thing they were most n atomic number 53d for was their beauty, Jack in particular. His slim nose, ample set blue eyes, shiny black hair and muscular build earned him the description as "drippingly handsome". Jacks cutting skirt instincts, swarthiness, and love for well-favoured young women earned him the nick name " Black Jack". Janet, who was sixteen years younger than Jack was non as beautiful as he was handsome. Janet did not possess a showgir l prettiness but she was said to have possessed an interesting look. She was petite and had a sensibly animated look to her. Her nose and chin were long and pointed. When Jackie was born it was happily noted that Jackie looked like Jack Bouvier. (Birmingham)Though Janet Lees family was well off, they were not members of the esteemed highest social caste as were the Bouviers. Janet lived her life with a constant sense of unease because of this difference in lineage.(Birmingham)Because Black Jack was known for having quaint financial history, James Lee, Janets father, offered to allow Janet and Jack to live rent free in a building he owned. This offer came under one condition. Jack would have to cut back on his flamboyant life-style. (Heymann)On March 3rd 1933, the Bouvier family was completed by the birth of Jackies sister, Lee. When Lee was born, Jackie was no longer the baby of the family.She spent most of her time tending and riding her horse. Jackie also excelled in school. Sh e was so intelligent that she found all her elementary track work as boring. Janet had once stated that, "Jackies intellectual ambition ran ahead of her chronological age." (Heymann)Soon problems began occurring between Black Jack and Janet. Jackie has never verbalise about her parents marriage issues but they are thought to have arisen because of money. At the time Black Jack was und... ...e style. The low profile lifestyle was very hard to obtain. The press was constantly inquiring if Jackie had any new love interests.Then on October 20th 1968, Jackie married Aristotle Onassis on the Greek island Scorpios. Aristotle was not only her sisters ex boyfriend, but he was also the richest man in the world. Their relationship was short lived. The couple had different tastes and their relationship had been condemned from the beginning.In march 1975, Aristotle was planning on divorcing Jackie, before he could do so he died. After his death, Jackie became very wealthy. She needed something to occupy herself with so she became an editor with Viking Press. both years later she moved over to Doubleday Press.In December on 1993, Jackie was diagnosed with non-Hodgkins lymphoma. She was treated for the disease with chemotherapy until May of 1994. In may she declared that she wanted to renovation to her home to die. On May 19, 1994, at 1015 a.m., Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis died surrounded by her friends and family. Her funeral took place at St. Ignatious Loyola church, the same church where she was baptized. She was later buried in Arlington cemetery next to John Kennedy.

Business Ethics :: GCSE Business Marketing Coursework

Businesses have power through their dexterity to spend vast amounts of money. They have the ability to enhance or change situations that the common individual does not. As organizations affect many people, they have obligations to their employees, consumers, community and the world. They have a responsibility to conduct caper in a way that is not harmful and which positively benefits as many people as possible and themselves. Although this sounds simple, it is easier said than done as at that place will always be a conflict of interest between various groups of people. Any decisions made by businesses need to be made with an cognizant aw beness of the specific situation and then act according to some sort of system of principals which is Business Ethics. What is Business Ethics? Business ethics is incisively the same as normal ethics, and that is knowing what is right or wrong, and learning what is right and what is wrong in a business environment. Then doing the right thing, p recisely the right thing is not as straightforward as explained in many business ethics books. Most ethical dilemmas in the workplace are not simply a matter of Should she steal from him? or Should he lie to his boss? Businesses flush toiletnot function without ethics, why? Society dictates a set of rules and conformities and perceive as all businesses strive after common goals it means that these goals can only be achieved on the basis of standards, values and morals in society. It can be assumed that business life has to be called moral as well. As in society, standards and values are spontaneously formed once people gain thats when morals come into effect, and when businesses decide on implicit or explicit ways to achieve certain goals and then are agreed on. Businesses in superior general are working on the basis of an ethics that settles different interests. The standards and values within companies can be characterized as mutual respect. In this respect it is in everyones interest, and is considering people as an end in themselves, not as a means, reciprocity and fairness. This ethics is passed down and filtered to a group of stakeholders who have an interest in the company. These parties usually are personnel, customers, suppliers, subcontractors, shareholders, society and those who speak on behalf of the environment and future generations. Many ethicists say theres always a right thing to do base on moral principle, and others believe the right thing to do depends on the situation, ultimately its up to the individual on what they do and on what they believe to be the right thing is.

Business Ethics :: GCSE Business Marketing Coursework

Businesses have power through their ability to spend vast amounts of money. They have the ability to enhance or change situations that the common individual does not. As organizations affect many people, they have obligations to their employees, consumers, community and the world. They have a responsibility to conduct business in a way that is not harmful and which positively benefits as many people as possible and themselves. Although this sounds simple, it is easier said than done as there will always be a conflict of pursuit between various groups of people. Any decisions made by businesses need to be made with an informed awareness of the specific situation and then act consort to some sort of system of principals which is Business Ethics. What is Business Ethics? Business ethics is exactly the same as normal ethics, and that is knowing what is right or wrong, and learning what is right and what is wrong in a business environment. Then doing the right thing, but the right thin g is not as straightforward as explained in many business ethics books. Most ethical dilemmas in the workplace are not simply a matter of Should she steal from him? or Should he lie to his boss? Businesses cannot function without ethics, why? Society dictates a set of rules and conformities and seeing as all businesses strive after common goals it performer that these goals can only be achieved on the basis of standards, values and morals in society. It can be assumed that business life has to be called moral as well. As in society, standards and values are spontaneously formed once people come thats when morals come into effect, and when businesses decide on implicit or explicit ways to achieve certain goals and then are agreed on. Businesses in general are working on the basis of an ethics that settles different interests. The standards and values within companies can be characterized as mutual respect. In this respect it is in everyones interest, and is considering people as a n end in themselves, not as a means, reciprocity and fairness. This ethics is passed down and filtered to a group of stakeholders who have an interest in the company. These parties usually are personnel, customers, suppliers, subcontractors, shareholders, society and those who speak on behalf of the environment and future generations. Many ethicists say theres always a right thing to do based on moral principle, and others believe the right thing to do depends on the situation, ultimately its up to the individual on what they do and on what they believe to be the right thing is.